An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Tax Administration as a Tool for Enhancing Economic Development in Nigeria, A case Study of Federal Inland Revenue Service, Gusau.
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Tax Administration
as a Tool for Enhancing Economic Development in Nigeria, A case Study of
Federal Inland Revenue Service, Gusau.
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
1.1 BACKGROUND
OF STUDY
Taxation
is used as a major instrument for revenue generation as a key factor to
sustainable economic growth and development.
However,
the situation is different is a developing economy like that of Nigeria. The
Nigeria Tax system is exercised with unbraid of
problems ranging from administrative inefficiency, tax evasion and
avoidance, lack of proper orientation of the citizens, lack of training and
incentives and ineffective for taxation to be used as a principle tools to
sustain economic development in the country. It is an indisputable fact that
tax (benefit of an effective tax administration system in Nigeria) have not had
the district effect on the various segments of the Nigeria economy, a careful
look at the Nigeria tax collections system. This is because of the standard of
living of people and general economic situation of the country (Nigeria). In
fact, tax is one of the major sources of revenue for the Nigeria government at
all levels of the tiers of government (Federal, state and local government
levels).
The
annual budget of the government hugely depends on its income, which is
principally derived from taxes. The taxes generated by government are used to
provide social amenities for the people (citizens). Apart from revenue
generation, taxation can also be used to regulate investment and control
inflation in the country. One of the factors determining the taxable capacity
of a country is administrative competences of the tax collecting organs of the
government.
The problem of tax collection has however been generally
accepted and some degree of effort have been made and still being made to
eradicate tax avoidance and evasion. This is however attributed to the degree
of poverty ignorance illiteracy and inefficient collection machinery in the
Nigerian tax system. The gross inadequacy machinery in the put in place for tax
collection has in no small measure affected the high degree of tax avoidance
and evasion. The project will highlight the benefit that will be derived from a
well structured and effective tax administration in Nigeria. This can be
achieved through adequate funding and provision of a sound economy and this is
directly related to adequacy source of revenue for the Nigerian economy which
is a dream yet to become a reality.
1.2 STATEMENT
OF THE PROBLEM
Even
though drastic measures has been taken by government to improve and enhance the
Nigeria tax system and administration of tax in the country, the Nigerian tax
system is still faced with a lot of problems like ambiguity in tax, ignorance
and illiteracy of the tax payers, tax avoidance and evasion, understatement of
profit by individuals and companies and the situation where companies prepare
two (2) financial statement and present whichever is of benefit to then to the
tax authorities. These problems can however be reduced to the near of minimal
of government can employ qualified tax offices, increase the salaries of the
tax officers to a level of minimal satisfaction, create an enlightenment
program to educate the tax payers on the importance of tax payment to every Nigerian
and the Nigerian economy as a while and also provide adequate machinery
(manpower and technological facilitated needed to effectively carry out the tax
operations.
1.3 OBJECTIVES
OF THE STUDY
The
objective of this research work is to find a lasting solution to the problems
imitating against the effective tax administration in the country (Nigeria).
The need for an effective and efficient tax system cannot be over stressed.
Obviously, it can be used as a instrument to generate fund for government to execute
its various programs and as fiscal tool/instrument for charting appropriate
economic development, bearing in mind, this research work is aimed at economic
growth in the country and to find out ways of achieving it.
1.4 RESEARCH
QUESTIONS
The
performance of any government can be measured from the angle of the economics
of the development of the country.
In
an attempt to reach a dependable solution to the problem of the study, the
following questions are therefore raised:
i.
Does effective and efficient tax system have
any significant role of play on the economic development of Nigeria?
ii.
Does tax evasion and avoidance have any
effect on achieving economic development in Nigeria?
iii.
Does tax revenue generation influence the
country’s economic development?
iv.
Does the current tax system have any
significant impact on the economic situation of the country?
v.
Is the Nigerian tax system equipment with the
most proper and qualified staff?
vi.
Is the Nigerian tax system the most
appropriate for the Nigerian current economic situation?
1.5 SIGNIFICANCE
OF THE STUDY
Taxation
is a major economic tool in enhancing economic development of any nation. It
has become imperative that Nigeria being a developing economy needs to stretch
line in its tax machinery aimed at enhancing its economic development. The
major beneficiaries of this study therefore are:
i.
The researchers:- This study has indeed
enhance our knowledge about the Nigerian tax system and it has increase our
understanding of taxation as a course in this institution.
ii.
Other Researcher:- Other students or
researcher who intend to conduct a research on issues relating to tax
administration in Nigeria can make reference to this very particular research
work as a source of secondary data.
iii.
Lecturers:- Lecturer on the course of
compling ther lecturer notes can have access to this research work as an
addition ton this knowledge or the materials in their position.
iv.
The general public:- This research work will
enlighten the general public on the importance of tax administration to the
economy of the country, the barrier tax avoidance and evasion causes to the
Nigerian tax system etc.
1.6 LIMITATION
OF THE STUDY
In
the course of this research work, it suffered limitations which affected
adversely any generalization that might be attempted with it, as the study
involves an in depth and exhaustive analysis of the Nigerian tax system there
was difficultly in the collection of sufficient relevant data as it is not
possible to extend the survey beyond federal inland revenue service Gusau in
view of the nature of the study.
Moreover,
the researcher does not have sufficient time to travel to different states in
order to cover a wide range.
Another
challenge is the inability to get asses to some of secrecy and lack of up to
date in the (F.I.R.S) Gusau. This however, posed the problems of gaining an
insight on how much was generated and expended on projects.
The
constraints of finance and disruptions from academic activities equally
affected the research. In spite of the limitation stated above, it is hoped
that the sample covered would be adequate through proper scrutinizing for the
realization of the objectives.
1.7 DELIMITATION
OF THE STUDY
The
scope of the study covers the federal Inland Revenue service (F.I.R.S.) Gusau.
Hence, the scope of this research project is limited to Gusau in zamfara state.
1.8 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF FEDERAL INLAND
REVENUE SERVICE, GUSAU
The
Nigeria federal Inland Revenue service was created in 1943 when it was carved
out from the east while inland revenue department that covered what was then
the anglo phone west Africa (including Ghana, Gambia and Sierra Leone) during
the colonial era.
In
1958, the load of Inland Revenue was established under the income tax ordinance
when the federal name was later changed in 1961 when the federal board of
Inland Revenue was established under section 4 of company’s income tax Act – No
22 of 1961. Federal board of Inland Revenue operated then as a department in
the federal ministry of finance. A further transformation of the federal board
of inland revenue took place in 1993 when the finance (Miscellaneous taxation
provisions) Act of No. 3 of 1993 established the federal inland revenue service
as the operation corn of federal inland of inland revenue. The Act also created
the office of the executive chairman of the board.
On
the first of October, 1996, the federal Inland Revenue service Gusau come on
stream. The board came into under the chairmanship of Alhaji sama’ila Maru with
detachment of staff started to expend beyond Gusau opening up four (4) other
branches to aid them in collection of these taxes. The branches include:
- Gusau
zonal office
- Zurmi
zonal office
- Talata
mafara zonal office
- Kaura
Namoda zonal office
In
2005 all these branches were closed when the office was upgraded to integrated
tax office.
1.9 DEFINITION
OF TERMS
ANNUAL
ALLOWANCE:- An annual allowance is given
in respect to qualifying assets from year to year. The allowances are granted
in annual year of assessment for the period for which the qualifying assets as
in use for the purpose of trade, business profession or vocation.
BASIC
PERIOD: This is the manner in which an assessment is determined. It is the
accounting year of business to year. It is also known as the government year
which commence from 1st January every year to 31st
December of the same year.
CAPITAL
ALLOWANCE:- This is a charge or deduction usually made periodically in the
accounts of an individual carrying on a trade, business, profession or vocation
for depreciation of fixed assets.
EARNED
INCOME:- Incomes which are derived by an individual as a result of usage of
mental and physical energy, such income includes, salaries, wages, bond,
benefit in kind, allowance etc.
EVALUATION:
- This is the making of judgment about the number, amount or value of
something.
INITIAL
ALLOWANCE:- It is an allowance given in the assessment for the year of
assessment in the basic period for expenditure incurred. It is only granted
once in the life of an asset.
CHAPTER
TWO
1.0
LITERATURE
REVIEW
2.1 INTRODUCTION
The
aim of this chapter is to review the work of others regarding the concept of
taxation, incidence of tax, tax administration in Nigeria, and the problem of
Nigeria tax system.
2.2 CONCEPT
OF TAXATION
A
tax is a fee charged or levied by a government on a product income or activity.
If it is levied directly on personal or corporate income, it is called direct
tax. If it is levied on the price of goods or services, then if is called an
indirect tax (Worlu and Nkoro 2012). Furthermore, the institute of chartered
accountants in Nigeria (2006) defined tax ‘as enforced contribution of money to
government pursuant to a defined authorized legislation. Okafor 2012 added that
“every tax must be based on a valid state. Without a valid statute no
legislates tax can be imposed”.
Therefore,
the act of the above responsibility of tax paye in contributing to the income
of government and subsequent demand by the government through its agent to pay
the compulsory levy is what is known as “taxation”.
Taxation
therefore, is the process and system of levying and collection of tax. Tax of
individuals and companies income is reduced hence taxation only affects
individuals and companies disposable income. Taxation provides government with
the revenue with which it caters for expenditures on economic, social,
political and cultural matters. The issue of taxation is the revenue generation
of any nation is of valuable importance. During the formal launching of the
Nigeria institute of taxation in 1983 the chairman of the occasion comment
thus. Taxation is such an important aspect in the life of any nation, and
therefore, the need to be further developed to certain standard is also
important. No nation or government can function effectively when it is
restricted of the needed fund to meet its ever increasing obligations. Based on
this premise, there is need for Nigeria to change their attitude towards
ensuring regular and continuous payment.
2.2.2 TYPES
OF TAXATION
There
are various types of tax which constitute a large percentage of the total
revenue or income to the government these major taxes are classified into two
(2):
1.
DIRECT
TAXES
These are taxes which are
directly borne by the tax payers. They are collected directly from the tax
payers. They are imposed directly upon the income or wealth of individual(s) or
companies paying the tax and the incidence of such taxes fall directly on the
tax payer since it is not possible for the person(s) who pay the tax to shift
the burden to someone else. That is, the incidence of direct taxes varies from
one tax payer to another, according to their functional circumstances and their
payment is a direct transaction between the tax payers and the government.
Direct taxes can be further categorized as follows:
PERSONAL
INCOME TAX
This is a form of tax where
tax is derived on the income of the individual tax payer. This income includes
income from employment, individual effect (i.e. sole trader), partnership,
investment and trust settlement. Section 3 of income tax management Act of 1961
as amended provide that income of individual, community or any trustee or
executor under any trust or estate are prose to the income tax levy. With the
exception of osculating (Itinerate workers). The taxation of an individual is a
formation of resident state.
The personal income tax is
provide for and covered by the income tax management Act (I.T.M.A) of 1961 as
amended and it is controlled by state internal revenue board (SIRB) and the
joint tax board (J.T.B). The tax payer is normally given some allowance or
relicts which are subtracted from his income before arriving at his income
which is to be taxed. This income after allowance deduction is usually referred
to as “taxable or chargeable income”.
Below are types of allowance
granted
i.
Personal allowance
ii.
Wife allowance (abolished in 1992)
iii.
Children allowance (maximum of four (4)
children)
iv.
Dependent relative allowance (maximum of two
(2) relatives)
v.
Life assurance premium
vi.
Disable person allowance
vii.
Equity shareholders in a research and
development companies
viii. Donation
to research institutions and canters
CAPITAL GAIN TAX
Capital
gain tax is a form of tax which is imposed on gain arriving from the disposal
of fixed assets, by companies or individuals. Capital gain tax was introduced
in Nigeria with the effect from April 1967 by the promulgation of the capital
gain tax decree No. 444 of 1967, now renamed capital gain act 1967, this act
oversees and caters for the capital gain tax in Nigeria, it is controlled and
administered by the federal board of inland revenue (FBIR) and state internal
revenue board (SIRB). It became applicable throughout the country to both
individuals and companies with the promulgation of the finance (miscellaneous
taxation provision) decree No. 15 of 1996, the decree was promulgated with retrospective
effect.
CAPITAL TRANSFER TAX
This
is a tax levy on the value of any property transferred by person during its
life time. The transfer of the property must be considered between connected
person or individuals, this is provided for by the capital transfer tax act of
1st April, 1979 and it is administered, collected, controlled and
implemented by state inland revenue board (SIRB) with reference to the act,
capital transfer tax shall be payable on property with value exceeding N100,000
COMPANY INCOME TAX
Company
income tax is a tax imposed by the government on the income and profits of
companies operating in the country. The law which was first enacted in 1961,
which has undergo so many amendment, the least being that of April, 2007. The
administration of the companies income tax is rested on the federal inland
revenue service (FIRS) which used to be known as the federal inland revenue
establishment act in April 2007 which scripted the federal board of internal
revenue (FBIR) and replaced it with the federal inland revenue service. It has
its headquarters at the federal capital territory (Abuja) and offices in all
the states of the federation.
THE PETROLEUM PROFIT TAX
In
accordance with company income tax act 1979, section 19 of the act provide for
some reliefs. Meanwhile, petroleum profit tax can be defined as a levy by
government on the profit generating by individuals/companies on the sale of
petroleum in the country.
2.
INDIRECT
TAXES
These are taxes initially
suffered by a tax payer but ultimate tax burden is borne by the final consumer
of the goods and services. Various cases of indirect taxes are as follows:
IMPORT
DUTIES
Import duties are tax levied
on goods imported into the country paid by the importers and later borne by the
final consumer of such goods.
EXCISE
DUTIES
This is an indirect tax
levied on the production of goods, sales or consumption of certain commodities
such as tobacco, beer etc.
VALUE
ADDED TAX
This is tax imposed on spending paid by
supplier or manufacturers of goods and bodies rendering service but borne by
the final consumers. The administration of VAT is governed by provision of VAT
decree No. 102 of 1993 as amended. VAT is a tax on consumption of valuable
goods and services, ministries, parastatals and other agencies of government
pay Vat on their consumption. VAT is paid as a percentage of the contract price
of the item consumed. All federal, states, and local government agencies,
religious organization and other similar person, corporate and non corporate,
including those that are normally excepted from income tax are expected to pay
VAT on the goods and services consumed by them.
2.2.2 PRINCIPLE
OF TAXATION (CANON)
A
good tax system is one that is easy to administer and must comply with the
following canons of taxation:
i.
Equity: This means that the distribution of
the tax burden must be equitable. Everyone should be made to pay his equity,
this means that those with the same income should pay an equal amount of tax.
Vertical equity means that those with different income should pay different
amount of tax
ii.
Convenience:- Under this case, taxes should
be convenient in such a way that the manner and time of payment should be
suitable to the tax payers.
iii.
Certainty:- This scope of the tax should be
clear. The tax should not be arbitrary. The tax payer ought to be aware of the
exact amount of tax they are expected to pay as well as the time and method of
payment.
iv.
Economy:- The administration cost should not
be higher than the revenue to be realized. This principle of taxation requires
that taxes should not be imposed if their cost of collection is excessive. A
tax can be considered economical if the cost of collection is not excessive.
v.
Simplicity:- A good tax system should be
coherent, simple and straight forward. The tax should be clear to the tax
payers and must be accepted by the public. Ambiguity should be avoided. A
properly understood tax system eliminates the chances of corruption and fraud
by tax officials.
vi.
Flexibility:- The tax system should be
flexible especially in a feudal and
democratic country where there are always change of government. It is
recognized under the principle that instead of rigid tax system. A tax system
that is responsible tax system would allow any tax found to be absolutely to be
scarping and to be replacing with meaningful and collectable tax. The laws
guiding it should be flexible in nature to requirement of changing government.
vii.
Impartiality: This principle recognize that a
tax should not be discriminating between tax payers under similar circumstances.
An important tax system ensures all person similar should be placed to pay the
same amount of tax.
viii. Productivity
fiscal adequacy: This principle advocates that the fee from tax collection
should be adequate to cover government expenditure.
2.3
INCIDENCE OF TAX
By
incidence of tax we refers to who pays or bears the burden of tax with direct
taxes, it is not difficult to determine who pays the tax, as it falls direct on
the company or individuals income or wealth the problem however. Is with
indirect taxes which are imposed on commodities and they are only paid when
these commodities are bought in certain instances, the tax incidence is wholly
on the suppliers or producers, produces in some cases on the consumer while in
other case, it is shared between both supplies and consumers. The burden of tax
is determined by the elasticity of demand for such commodities that helped to
locate who pays the tax. It must be emphasized that during the pre – colonial
ere, taxation function principally on an ethical basis. In the chieftaincies
areas with a centralizes authority, administrative machinery and judicial
institutions such as in the northern Nigeria, Yoruba land and Benin Kingdom
where there were Emirs and Obas respectively, there was a system of taxation.
This was not so in the non- chieftaincies areas like the Ibos, Tivs, Bura,
Ebura and Badara areas, they exercise little or no form of organized taxation.
During those period, the form of taxation operation in the northern area are as
follows: Zakkat, a religious tithe/alms, exclusively for Muslims, paid on
wealth (money, crops and livestock) had if origin from farming for use of
landed property for agricultural purpose. It is collected by Dongaris who are
errand boys for the emirs. The Shuika tax ( a plantation tax) was paid on all
crops not subject to Zakkat, and the Jangali (cattle tax) was levied on
livestock’s. Jizya was a tax paid to the king by conquered tribe.
Before
the coming of the British colonial masters, Nigerians cheerful paid their taxes
in kind by rendering free services such as clearing the bush, digging pit
toilets and wells e.t.c for the benefit of the community as a whole.
i.
Where demand is perfectly elastic, the
supplier bears the tax. However, there are some situations where the supplier
wholly bears the tax burden, as increase in price will cause a fall in quantity demanded.
ii.
Where the demand is perfectly inelastic, then
the supplier can successfully transfer the burden of the tax to the consumer.
This is therefore, a situation where the burden of tax is borne only by the
consumer as increase in price of any elastic demand will also cause quantity
demanded and supply increase.
iii.
When the demand for the commodity is
relatively inelastic demand, it is when it shows that both the suppliers and
consumers bear the tax burden. In this situation of relatively inelastic
demand, the suppliers and the consumer will be shared between them but the
consumer will bear the greater part of it.
iv.
In a case where there is a relatively elastic
demand, the tax will be shared between the suppliers and the consumer but the
supplier been the greater part of it.
2.4 TAX ADMINISTRATION
The Nigeria we know today is an amalgamation
of two (2) major regions. These regions were engaged by the British for a long
time before Nigeria obtained its independence prior to the coming of colonial
rule, there has been a particular system varied from one part to the other. As
time goes by, the voluntary contributions gradually transferred into obligation
to contributes in money or in kind to the provisions and maintains of public
services since as at that time, there was no objective means of measuring tax,
to this regard, the apportionment, contribution and collection of levies was
bound to be extremely complicated and difficult invariably reading themselves
to abuse and prevision of justice, it was common for the revenue collector to
use taxation as a means of slowing favour to some people to some people or a
means of opposing other people through arbitrary assessment and unjust fines,
was the reason why you Can have a king, but the man to fear is the tax
collector.
The
first step taken towards improving the taxation system was the introduction of
income tax law (Nature revenue proclamation No. 2) entitled land revenue
proclamation was first introduced in northern Nigeria in 1904 as personal
income tax (community tax) by Lord Lugard in order to check some of the abuse of
traditional community tax as it was operated in Northern Nigeria. They later
introduced the direct tax system to the north as part of the indirect rule
system of governance in 1960. In 1928, it was extended to eastern Nigeria. The
extension of the ordinance faced resistance by the residents leads to riot in
some eastern districts (e.g Aba women riot of 1929).
The
development of income tax in Nigeria was greatly influenced by the provision of
1914 and 1960 constitution which related to the sharing of income tax revenue
among the tiers of government.
The
highlights of the constitutional provision are as follows:
a.
Each regional government to fix the rate
under the direct tax ordinance, collect tax and sharing to draw a distinction
between tribute collectible by traditional rulers in their capacity as rulers
and judges on one hand and “taxes” on the other hand (i.e chiefs were to pay
one fourth of the revenue collected by traditional method of the government).
b.
To consolidate all taxes into single general
tax payable annual on a single demand under the same “HARAKI”. These led to
elimination of “ZAKKAT” and “JIZYA” while Haraki and Jangali tax retained. But
during that period, the native resident
in southern Nigeria had no law regulation (national or colonial).
c.
The central government should fix the rate
and share the proceed to the regions on the basis of derivation.
d.
The central government should fix the company
income tax collected and retain the whole proceed to the tax. But this
provision of the constitution at the eastern and western regions was granted
internal government. In 1956 they stated their own tax laws and they had the
power to impose tax on their resident and retain the proceed of such taxes.
Income Tax Management Act 1961 (ITMA) it was the act of National Assembly and
applied to three regions in Nigeria ( Northern, Southern and Eastern region)
while Lagos (FCT) had its separate law referred to as “personal income tax
(Lagos) Act 1961, this act of ITMA was enacted for three reason:
i.
Promote personal income tax law and the
ascertainment of income of individual liable to pay tax through out the
federation.
ii.
To promote uniformity in the incidence and
application of personal income tax throughout the country.
iii.
To confirm with the provision of the
constitution to ensure that no income tax was subjected to tax by more than one
tax authority in the country. Any region adopting the law must ascertain income
of individual in the territory in accordance with the provisions of provisions
ITMA. May region that could not adopt the provision of ITMA could enact its own
personal income tax law without adopting ITMA, must conform with provisions of
ITMA.
iv.
The act contains the following provisions:
a.
Identifying the source of income chargeable
to tax.
b.
Ascertainment of the deduction allowable and
not allowed.
c.
Identifying assessable income from a
particular source.
d.
Double taxation relief provision
e.
Establishment of joint tax board (JTB) with
the duty promoting uniformity in the administration of personal income taxation
through out the federation.
THE JOINT TAX BOARD
This
was established under the income tax management act (ITMA) of 1961 as amended
according to the personal income tax decree of 1993. The composition of joint
tax board (JTB) is a follow:
i.
The Executive Chairman of the federal board
of internal revenue (FBIR) is also the
chairman of joint tax board (JTB).
ii.
An office from each state of the federation
and the federal capital territory being a person revenue income tax matters
nominated by the commissioner of finance of a particular state.
iii.
A secretary of the board appointed by the
federal public service commission to record the proceeding of the meeting of
the board. He is not a member of the board.
iv.
The legal adviser of the federal board of
internal revenue (FBIR) who is not a member of the board but in attendance as
an observer and offer advice when required.
POWER
AND DUTIES OF THE JOINT TAX BOARD
The
personal income tax decree of 1993 stipulated the power and duties of the joint
tax board as follows:
a.
Exercise the power or duties conferred on it
by express provision of this decree any matter arising under the decree which
may be agreed by the government of each territory to be exercised by the board.
b.
Exercise power and perform duties conferred
by any enactment of the federal government in posing tax on the income and profit of companies or which
may be agreed by the minister are to be exercised or performed by it under the
enactment in place of the federal board of inland revenue.
c.
Advice the federal government on request in
respect of double taxation arrangement concluded or under consideration with
any other country and in respect of rate of capital allowance and other
taxation matter having effect throughout Nigeria and
d.
Use its best endeavour to promote uniformity
both in application of this decree and in the incidence of tax on individuals
throughout Nigeria.
e.
Imposed decision on matters of procedure and
interpretations of this decree of any state for purpose of conformity with
agreed producer or interpretation.
f.
Exercise power and perform duties relating to
companies income tax which might be delegated to it by the minister of finance.
POWER AND DUTIES OF THE FEDERAL BOARD OF
INLAND REVENUE (FBIR)
The
board, that is FIBR has the power to assess, collects and administers the taxes
through:
a. Company
tax on companies
b. Withholding
tax on companies
c. Petroleum
profit tax
d. Value
added tax (VAT)
e. Education
tax
f. Capital
gain tax for Abuja resident and corporate bodies’ nationwide.
g. Collection
of stamp duties of corporate entities.
h. The
personal income of external affairs, nonresident of federal capital territory
Abuja and armed forces personnel.
i. It’s
also responsible for initiating amendment to tax law.
j. Negotiating
and concluding double taxation agreement in addition to the above powers, the
board has the following duties:
1.
Can sue and be sued in its name.
2.
It ensure that amount collected by the
services are accounted for and paid into government confers.
3.
It can acquire hold and dispose off
properties of any defaulting companies and handover the proceed to the minister
of finance.
4.
With the approval of minister of finance it
can delegate some of its certain exception.
5.
Generally, it controls the management of the
services on matters of policies subject to the provision of the law setting to
the service.
6.
Appointing, promoting and discipline
(including dismissing) employee of the service.
THE TECHNICAL COMMITTEE OF THE FEDERAL
BOARD OF INLAND REVENUE
The
act also established the technical committee of the federal board of Inland
Revenue is also the directors and Heads of department of federal board of
internal revenue service and secretary to the federal board of Inland
Revenue.
The
function of the technical committee is to advise the federal Inland Revenue
board on tax matter that requires professional and technical expertise. The
committee also to carry out any other duty assigned to it by the federal board
of Inland Revenue.
2.5 PROBLEMS OF NIGERIA TAX SYSTEM
It
has long been evident that company income tax administration in Nigeria is one
of the satisfactory and problematic of taxes in the system today. It is
therefore felt that company income tax in Nigeria requires a proper handling
the ensure that a large number of the taxable companies does not escape tax.
This
research work is an attempt to examine the problems of company’s income tax
administration in Nigeria. The following are some of the problems of company’s
income tax administration in Nigeria.
1. Lack
of voluntary compliance from the tax payers (companies): voluntary compliance
is seriously lacking this problems which manifest itself in defaults (willful
default) tax avoidance and evasion and delayed payment of taxes constitutes an
endemic problems of company income tax administration, tax avoidance and
evasion appear the most serious. It has become typical for companies to
manipulated the provisions of tax laws or exploit the loopholes there in, to
their advantage. The making of false claims in respect of capital allowances,
assurance premiums and false declaration of income receipt from trade, business
omission to state gross amount of dividend, rent e.t.c.
2. High
rate of corruption among tax officials: In this present day, Nigeria tax
collectors personal interest overrides their official interest in the
performance of the duties.
3. Inadequate
facilities and structured in the rural areas: There is absence of adequate
structure and organization of the body charge with the responsibility for
assessment and collection of company income tax and also facilities like motor
vehicle and motorcycle to carry out the assignment effectively is inadequate.
4. Mismanagement
of tax collected: Where taxes collected were not been utilized for the purpose
for which it was collected, this makes taxable companies not to give out or pay
more taxes.
5. Improve
use of tax consultations: The use of the consultant by the relevant tax
authority is not in full use. This is the inability of the relevant tax
authority to stock to the advice which the tax consultants have given to them
based on the assessment and collection of income from companies.
6. Constant
changes in the tax laws and policies: It will be important to note that there
has been several amendment to tax laws and policies. This is the ability of the
relevant tax authority to have knowledge or technical known how to tackle
issues relating to tax avoidance and tax evasion by companies.
7. Inadequate
funding: The relevant tax authority that is responsible for the assessment and
collection of company income tax is not been properly funded, and most of
staffs are not been given their pay.
8. Poor
record keeping: There is also the issue of poor record keeping. The relevant
tax authorities have not been able to keep proper record of their daily
transaction.
9. There
is also the issue of lack of proper accountability of the collected.
10. The
government of the nation sometimes completely neglects the relevant tax
authority.
11. Limited
or lack independence of the relevant tax authorities.
12. There
is also issue of lack of qualified and experienced tax officers to administer
tax law on defaulting companies and individuals.
13. There
is also the use of extra – legal means to collect tax by the relevant tax
authorities for companies.
2.6 SUMMARY
In
summary therefore, it is no doubt that the topic” An evaluation of the
effectiveness of tax administration as a tool in enhancing economic development
in Nigeria. A case study of federal inland revenue service Gusua” covers a lot
of works, which touches the aspect of effective and efficient economic development
in Nigeria, the barriers there to it, such as the problems of tax
administration in Nigeria.
CHAPTER THREE
2.0
RESEARCH
METHODOLOGY
3.1 INTRODUCTION
The
aim of this chapter is to point out the total population of the federal inland
revenue service Gusau, and the possible sample there from it, how the research
is designed, the methods of collection of data, the method of administration of
questionnaires and method of data analysis.
3.2.
POPULATION.
According
to Magaji (2006) population in a more specialized sense include not just
people, but also events, animals and objects who are members of the target of
the study as defined by the aims and objectives of the researchers.
The
population of this study is made up of the staff of the federal Inland Revenue
service Gusau, who are thirty eight (38).
3.3 SAMPLE
According
to oxford advance learners dictionary, sample size is a number of people or
things taken from a large group and used in test to provide information about
the group.
Using
a stratified sampling technique a sample size of twenty (20) was chosen out of
the population of thirty eight (38) for the purpose of this study.
3.4 RESEARCH
DESIGN
Descriptive
system of study is used in this project so as to achieve unbiased and maximize
reliability to achieve the desired result. To maintain consistency on topic of
this nature, descriptive study is the best approach since the researchers have
no definite control over the subject.
3.4.1 METHOD
OF DATA COLLECTION
Data
collection is an activity aimed at obtaining relevant information for decision
making. the researchers used both primary and Secondary sources of collect data for this study.
1. Primary
source: The primary source refers to the
data obtained from original sources, the various method used by the
researchers in collecting data include
a. Questionnaire
b. Personal
interview
a. Question:-
Questionnaire is designed to obtain information from the employees of the board
to find out about the effectiveness of tax administration and its effect on the
development of the Nigerian economy. Based on the answer given to the
questions, the researchers will be able to determine the effectiveness of tax
administration and how it influence the economic development of Nigeria.
b. Personal
interview:- This is a technique adopted to get direct information from people
(respondent) on a face to face basis. It is designed to gather valid and
reliable information through the responses obtained from a class of planned
sequence of question.
2.
SECONDARY
DATA
In the area of secondary sources of
data, it includes the information that was already made available and
information that could be gotten from documents such as text books, journals,
newspapers, magazine etc.
3.4.2 METHOD OF ADMINISTRATION OF
QUESTIONNAIRES
The
questionnaires were administered personally by the researchers to the staffs of
federal Inland revenue service Gusau twenty (20) staffs selected at strata to
enable us have an insight on the problems of tax administration in Nigeria.
3.4.3 METHOD
OF DATA ANALYSIS
The
statistical procedure in analyzing data in the research is the simple
percentage.
The
representation of the respondent shall be the percentage, this it will be
calculated with the use of formula below:
CHAPTER FOUR
3.0
DATA
PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS
4.1 INTRODUCTION
This
chapter deals with the analysis of data collected through questionnaire. The
data collected will be analyzed using simple percentage formula. Twenty (20)
questionnaires were distributed to the staff of federal inland revenue service
and all were returned.
4.2 ANALYSIS
OF RESEARCH QUESTIONS
Question
1: Does effective and efficient tax system have any significant effect in the
economic development of Nigeria?
Table
4.2.1: Effective and efficient tax system
Option
|
Responses
|
Percentage (%)
|
Yes
|
5
|
25
|
No
|
15
|
75
|
Total
|
20
|
100
|
Source:
Questionnaire administered 2016
From
the above table 15 respondents representing 75% are of the opinion that
effective and efficient tax system does not play a vital role in the economic development
of Nigeria while 5 respondents representing 25% have contrary opinion.
Therefore, effective and efficient tax system does not play a major role in
economic development in Nigeria.
Question
2: Does tax evasion and avoidance have any effect on achieving economic
development in the country?
Table
4.2.2: Effect of tax evasion and avoidance
Option
|
Responses
|
Percentage (%)
|
Yes
|
16
|
80
|
No
|
4
|
20
|
Total
|
20
|
100
|
Source:
Questionnaire administered 2016
From
table 4.2.2. above 16 respondents representing 80% are of the opinion that tax
evasion and avoidance have effect on achieving economic development in Nigeria,
while 4 respondents representing 20% are of objective opinion. Therefore, tax
evasion and avoidance has an effect on
the achievement of economic development in the country.
Question
3: Does the revenue generated influence the country’s economic development?
Table
4.2.3. Influence of revenue generated on the economy.
Option
|
Responses
|
Percentage (%)
|
Yes
|
18
|
90
|
No
|
2
|
10
|
Total
|
20
|
100
|
Source:
Questionnaire administered 2016
From
the table 4.2.3 above, 18 respondents representing 90% are of the opinion that
revenue generated influence the country’s economic development, while 2
respondents representing 10% are of opposite opinion. So therefore, the revenue
generated have influence on the economic development of the country.
Question
4: Is it necessary to pay tax?
Table
4.2.4 Tax payment
Option
|
Responses
|
Percentage (%)
|
Yes
|
19
|
95
|
No
|
1
|
5
|
Total
|
20
|
100
|
Source:
Questionnaire administered 2016
The
above table shows that 19 respondents representing 95% are of the opinion that
it is necessary to pay tax, while 1 respondent representing 5% is of
contracting opinion. Therefore, it is necessary to pay tax.
Question
5: Does the current tax system have any significant impact on the economic
situation of the country?
Table
4.2.5 Impact of the current tax system on the economic situation
Option
|
Responses
|
Percentage (%)
|
Yes
|
19
|
95
|
No
|
1
|
5
|
Total
|
20
|
100
|
Source:
Questionnaire administered 2016
The
above table 4.2.5 show that 19 respondents representing 95% are of the onion
that the current tax system has impact on the economic development of the
country opinion. So therefore, the current tax system has significant impact on
the economic situation of the country.
Question
6: Do you think the government should reduce the current tax system rate?
Table
4.2.6: Current tax rate reduction
Option
|
Responses
|
Percentage (%)
|
Yes
|
8
|
40
|
No
|
12
|
60
|
Total
|
20
|
100
|
Source:
Questionnaire administered 2016
From
the above table 4.2.6, 8 respondents representing 40% are of the opinion that
government should reduce the current tax rate while 12 respondents representing
60% are of the opinion that the current tax rate should be maintained.
Therefore, government should maintain the current tax rate.
Question
7: Do you think government is using the best method of tax collection?
Table
4.2.7: Government tax collection method
Option
|
Responses
|
Percentage (%)
|
Yes
|
8
|
40
|
No
|
12
|
60
|
Total
|
20
|
100
|
Source:
Questionnaire administered 2016
The
table above 4.2.7 shows that 8 respondents representing 40% are of the opinion
that government is using the best method of tax collection, while 12
respondents representing 60% are of the opinion that government are not using
the best tax collection method. So therefore, government should adopt a better
tax collection method.
Question
8: Will effective tax system improve the welfare of the masses in the country?
Table
4.2.8: Effective tax system and welfare of the masses
Option
|
Responses
|
Percentage (%)
|
Yes
|
19
|
95
|
No
|
1
|
5
|
Total
|
20
|
100
|
Source:
Questionnaire administered 2016
The above table 4.2.8 shows that 19
respondents representing 95% are of the opinion that effective tax system will
improve the welfare of the masses, while 1 respondent representing 5% is of the
opinion that effective tax system will not improve the welfare of the masses.
Therefore, effective tax system will improve the welfare of the masses in the
country.
4.3 SUMMARY
OF FINDINGS
Based
on the data for this research, the following
is being revealed:
i.
Effective and efficient tax system does not
play a major role in economic development in Nigeria
ii.
Tax evasion and avoidance has an effect on
the achievement of economic development in the country
iii.
The revenue generated by government have influence
on the economic development of the country
iv.
It is necessary to pay tax
v.
Government should maintain the current tax
system
vi.
The government should adopt a better tax
collection method
vii.
Effective tax system will improve the welfare of masses in the
country.
CHAPTER FIVE
4.0
SUMMARY,
CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION
5.1 SUMMARY
It
is emphatic that taxation is indispensable and essential for the continuous
existence and strength of the modern state. This research work was embarked
upon due to some problems encountered in the act of tax collection, and the aim
of this study is to find solutions to the problems encountered through
reviewing the work of the researchers and authors, sourcing information a
sample size of twenty (20) which was drawn from a population of thirty – eight
(38) though stratified sampling techniques 20 questionnaires where administered
personally and all were returned and analysed using simple percentage formulae.
Finding revealed that it is impact to pay tax, of effective can improve the welfare
of the masses are effective and efficient tax system have effect on the
economic development of Nigeria and so on.
5.2 CONCLUSION
The
importance of taxation of the economic development of Nigeria cannot be over
emphasized, from the information available as a result of these study, it has
become crystal dear that taxation contribute immensely to the revenue and
consequently contribute to the economic development of Nigeria.
From
the historical perspective taxation has always been and adopted by people of
the communities to foreseen economic political and social co-existence.
Taxation is not only a vital tool necessary for generate the needed revenue to
grease the whole of the machinery of developing economy such a Nigeria but it
is inevitable fuel necessary for the continuous existence of developed economy
and sustenance of such that a great Britain and United State of America.
Taxation
is a very important tool for the generation of revenue for the economic
development of any nations and cannot be less important to be economy then fuel
is to an auto car. Therefore, there is the need for adequate and constant
development of any nations, and efficient
tax system for the continuous existence and sustenance of the Nigeria
tax system are not in surmountable. The study identified the major problems
militating against the system and recommended some measures that will improve
the Nigeria tax system, that is, administration, effectiveness and efficiency.
In
conclusion countries, taxations the principal source of revenue and instrument
for controlling economic activities. Taxation can be made to serve these
purposes in Nigeria if the recommendations are accepted and implemented, our
system can still be made to operate efficiently and efficiently and once these
are achieved taxation can be used as an economic instrument to generate fund
for government to produce its various programs and as a fiscal tool for
chanting appropriate economy.
5.3 RECOMMENDATIONS
Based
on the researcher’s findings, the following recommendations are made to achieve
effective and efficient administration and enhance economic development in
Nigeria:
1.
The government should set – up an
enlightenment program for the citizen on the effect of tax evasion and avoidance on the Nigeria economy,
and also the benefits of tax payment to the general public (every citizen) and
the economy of Nigeria as a whole.
2.
The government should provide reasonable
salary for the officials so that there should would be satisfaction in the
working environment of the tax officials, thereby creating a working
environment free greed and corruption.
3.
The government set – up a training and
retraining program for the tax official so as to prepare them for the basis and
process of administration and collection of tax in the country.
4.
The government should provide facilities such
as motor vehicles and motorcycles for the officials to ease and fasten the
process of tax collection and thereby reduce the ambiguity in tax collection.
5.
The government should make sure that all
revenue generated from the collection of tax are properly utilized to the
fullest so as to encourage the tax payer to continue to pay tax duly and
promptly.
REFERENCE
Agyei A.K. (1985): Personal income tax in Nigeria Lagos,
Headnary press ltd
A paper presentation
at a 3 days seminar on how to enhance revenue generation for government, in
Abuja (FCT) 26th – 28th June, 2014.
ICAN (2002): Tax aide mernoir (published by the institute
of chartered accounting of Nigeria
ICAN
Institute of chartered accountants in Nigeria (2009)
Magaji (2006) fundamental research methodology published
and printed by Universal press, surulere Ikorodu street, Lagos.
Osuala (1993): Economics of West African Ibadan, the
coxfon press.
Olatunji L.A. et al (2001) principle of taxation in
Nigeria (2nd edition): published and printed by might babs
productions Ibadan.
Okafor
(2012): management accounting in Nigeria 3rd edition
Worlu and Nkoro (2012): principles of taxation in
Nigeria, 2nd edition
Comments
Post a Comment