User Orientation and its effects on use of library resources in Kashim Ibrahim library, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

 

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1       Background of the Study

Nowadays there is enormous waste of information resources due to non-use and miss used in all types of libraries. This present a great challenge orienting the use is the proper solution. With shrinking budget libraries must encourage user to make greater and better use of available resources. In addition orientating the library user improves the quality of the use. User orientation aims to provide knowledge and skills necessary for a user to find his way in the library.

User orientation is day-by-day getting more relevant especially in the present context when new sources of information are available. Further more information and that too in fraction seconds, so he/she has to be orientated about not only the use of library resources ie the various sources of information, but also about the various complexities involved the success of orientation programme would depend upon planning knowledge of psychology of the users and investment of reference librarian.

Academic library as defined by Fabunmi (2012) are organized collection of information resources (prints and non-prints) which form an integral part of tertiary institution. In essence, the academic library provides resources to support the teaching and research activities of their parent’s institutions.

Furthermore, academic library is referred to as a library that is attached to post-secondary institution which they serve. Academic library is one which is established in institutions of higher learning to support learning, teaching and research activities of the universities and colleges. More so, academic library serves the research needs of institutions they serve and it is also the responsibility of any libraries to ensure that the use of its information sources, resources and services are maximized to benefit of its users.

Library resources as defined by Popoola and Haliso (2009) as those information bearing material in both material in both printed and electronic formats, such as text books, journals, indexes, abstracts, newspaper and magazines, report, CD-ROM databases, internet /Email, video tapes/cassette, diskettes, magnetic disk, computers, microforms etc. these information materials are the raw material that libraries acquire, catalogue, stocks, and make available to their patrons, as well as used to provide various other services. Library resources available, accessibility and use are important factor in knowledge acquisition, learning and research. Indeed every academic library regardless of size is expected to have adequate information resources available for its community for reading, learning and research.

In October 1962, the central library of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria which was designed originally for the Nigerian College of Arts, Science and Technology and was officially opened and named “Kashim Ibrahim Library” (KIL). The library was established to cater for the academic or educational needs of students and staff in terms of teaching and research. It also comprises the Kashim Ibrahim Library (the main Library) and eleven other satellite libraries located in different campuses of the university. Within the first three years of its existences, it started experiencing accommodation problems which was accentuated by rapid expansion of stock in its constituent’s libraries. Its bound periodicals were then shelved away in an adjourning block formerly used as classrooms and which also housed the bindery.

At that time, Kashim Ibrahim Library was serving twenty four departments of the faculties of Agriculture, Arts, Architecture, Engineering, Sciences and Veterinary medicine. It was also offering all sorts of assistance to the other libraries such as inter-library loan and cooperation. The library was known as ShettimaKashim library, until 30th June, 1963 when the name Shettima was dropped. This was because Shettima was not part of the name he was given and he was popularly known as Kashim Ibrahim. During the formal opening on the 3rd November, 1963, his Excellency, the then governor of the Northern State, Sir Kashim Ibrahim after whom it was named, said that it was a great honor and privilege to be called upon to open the great library which would be named after him. He went on to say that any library consists of books, non-books and building which are normally provided in that order.

According to Aguolu in Sirajo (2008) a library was the collective memory of mankind and it provide the students with the knowledge and wisdom of all times and climes. He further stated as a very small collection of books. By the Nigerian college of Arts, Science and Technology and additions have been made every year since the time. The library building then was that small building that is now the university staffs club. But collection of books in this great magnificent building which I shall open in a few minutes is a collection worthy of the great centre of learning which the library is designed to serve. Already it is the largest store – house of information in Northern Nigeria and it has very important role to play in the extension of higher learning and education in general. 

The librarian was Mr. W. J. Plumber, when he left; his successor Mr. J. M. M. Grey there of took the post and in addition left his own marks. He did not convert the stripdex catalogue which was used at that time back to cards but also change the classification scheme from the BLISS Bibliographical classification to the library of congress classification scheme by 1973. The university based selection policy remained flexible.

Between November 1973 and January 2018 the library has a total holding of over 1.2million volumes of books and 66,000 periodical titles. The university library has always been at the center of research and scholarship university library has always been at the center of research and scholarship playing major role in acquiring, processing, lending library materials and responding to patron’s inquiries. (http://library. abu.edu.ng/pages/about/php).

The library management in the past few years has been striving to upgrade the IT skills of the staff to enable them cope with challenges of the information age. Recently, thanks mostly to donations by the Mac-Arthur foundation and the Carnegies Corporation. Rapid progress has been made not only in updating the collection, but also in automation the resources and service of the library system. Today, online and CD-ROM searches are a common feature among, staffs and students of university. With staff strength of 42 professional and 109 para-professionals, 22 senior staffs and 102 junior non-professional staffs in the entire university library system, the library management is striving to upgrade the IT skills of the staffs to enable them cope with challenges of the information age. Kashim Ibrahim Library has gone through several hands and at present the librarian is in person of Prof. Umar Ibrahim. (http://library. abu.edu.ng/pages/about/php)

1.2       Statement of the Problem

Most of the newly admitted students of Ahmadu Bello Univesity (ABU)come from public schools with different background some of which possess little or no skills as how to utilize library materials such as retrieving appropriate books from shelves, use of internet and library catalogue. The institution library conduct orientation programmes in every first semester of each session, but still there are some students who face difficulties in accessing and use of library materials. They take long time to ask and go around themselves searching for particular resources. This situation made the researcher to embark on this study.  With the hope of finding why these students are not responding positively to the orientation given to them on usage of library resources in Kashim Ibrahim Library (A. B. U) Zaria.

1.3       Research Questions

            The research questions are as follows:

1.      How often does the KIL conduct user- orientation for their users?

2.      What is the effect of the orientation for the users of the library?

3.      What are the problems encountered in conducting the orientation?

4.      What are the ways to improve on the orientation programmes of the KIL ABU Zaria?

1.4       Objectives of the Study

            The following are the objectives of the study:

1.      To determine how often KIL conduct user – orientation for the users of the library.

2.      To find out the effect of the orientation on the users of the library.

3.      To find out the problems encountered in conducting the orientation.

4.      To determine ways to improve on the orientation programmes of the K.I.L ABU Zaria.

1.5       Significance of the Study

The need for effective use of information resources in the library gave rise to user orientation which is the most effective way of helping library users to be able to find their way in the library.

This study on user orientation will help the library patron find his way in the library with ease because of the knowledge and skills provided during orientation. It will reduce the lack of or non-use and misuse of all types of information materials.

Users orientation will promote longevity of library resources, that is because users will be oriented on the proper use of all types of materials in the library. Management will save cost on replacement of misused and damaged information resources as a result of proper, usage due to user orientation.

1.6       Scope and Delimitation of the Study

This study covers only Kashim Ibrahim Library ABU Zaria and it is limited to user orientation program of the library and its effects on usage of library resources.

1.7       Operational Definition of Terms

1.      Academic Library: Academic Library is one which is established in institutions of higher learning to support learning teaching and research activities of the university and colleges

2.      Library Resources: Library resources is a platform or media on which information is documented with the intension to store, preserve, manage, disseminate or retrieve and utilize.

3.      Orientation: means the adjustment or enlightenment of oneself or ones idea to surround or circumstance.

4.      User: Any person who uses something

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES

http://library. abu.edu.ng/pages/about/php

Fabunmi, P. M. (2012). User education and library use in college of education in Abia and Imo State Library philosophy and practice

Popoola, S. O., and Haliso, Y. (2009). Use of libray information resources and services as predation of teaching effectiveness of socialist ceinectist in Nigeia universities. AJAIS 19 (i): 65 – 77.

Sirajo, H. (2008). User orientation and its effect on use of serial publication. A case study of Kashim Ibrahim Library, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. An unpublished project submitted to Department of Library and Information Science, Ahamdu Bello University, Zaria.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER TWO

REVIEW OF RELATED LITERATURE

2.1       Introduction

This chapter presents the conceptual framework and literature review of this study. The concept and review was done under the following sub-headings:

2.2        User education programmes

2.3        User orientation in libraries

2.4        The effect of user education programmes onusers of the library

2.5        The problems encounter in conducting the orientations programme

2.6        The ways to improve on the orientation programme of the library

2.7        Summary of the review

2.2       User education programmes

User education programmes should be developed in order to assist library users in developing necessary skills to access the new information and communication technologies available in the libraries. Library orientation and user orientation programme form parts of such a user education programmes. Tucker in Sirajo (2008) summarizes these as the art of discrimination together with independent of lifelong learning skills. These higher levels skills have been codified under the banner of information literacy. This thinking has developed along dual path. There is tradition of theoretical deliberation about pedagogy of information skill teaching, and alongside if there is practitioner tradition of documenting practice which shows how far library professional have been able to embody good instructional models in their teaching. Thus to cite one example from many, the practitioner Hanson took instructional model from Bruner and Gagno(2006) and applied them within the sphere of library user education. Such models emphasized important facets of learning process. Hanson work took from Bruner (2006) the need to acknowledge the nature of the learner and the way in which the learner obtain knowledge. Drawing on demonstrate how they have understood the rules of information system while receiving feedback on their performance during practice in “spaced review”. The ultimate aim of any user education programme in the use of library is to enrich users educational experiences by enabling them maximize their use of library services and materials. According to Fox, in university this task needs to be based on their definition of the library. The key word here is “awareness” and “utility”. Library user should be aware of existing library resources and how best to exploit and use them.

It is lack of awareness that prompted Wiggins in Sirajo (2008) to observe that everyday patrons walk out of libraries convinced that; there is little or nothing in our collections on their topic of study. Musisi in his MLS Thesis argued that the need to adopt library user education in Kenya as a means for effective dissemination of information and knowledge for national development. In his findings, he placed enough emphasis on the place of library education in higher institution and summed-up the general aims of library user education as:

                    i.            Having a general knowledge of existing channels of scientific and technical communication and their importance.

                  ii.            Acquainting the readers in the rudiments of libraries and helping them to overcome difficulties when they begin to make use of library; the ultimate and in view being the encouragement of readers into the use of reading material available in the library.

These are vital aims because most student do not know what the library services is all about let alone know to exploit the resources. Fleming (2010) stated that the user education "as various programmes of instruction, education and exploitation provided by libraries to users to enable them to make more effective and efficient and independent use of information resources and services to which these libraries provide access to". Some specific components of user education are:

i.              Librarians introducing new students, some of whom come from school systems where there are generally no school libraries or well established libraries, to the complexities of university library facility.

ii.            Librarians familiarizing users, who have little or no information seeking skills at all with a broad range of library resources in order to develop library skills.

iii.          Librarians educating user on how to find materials manually orelectronically using on-line Public Access Catalogue and CD-ROMS.

An evaluation of user education literature reveals the importance of user education in academic libraries. It is believed that improving users' knowledge of their library’s collection and services could be a motivating factor for more usage and more demand on the library.Mews (2010) argues that training in the use of information should be parts of student’s education. There is need for instruction in the use of libraries and information services. He sees user education as a continuous process which should cover use of the catalogue, abstracts, bibliographies, and reference books. At the post-graduate level detailed instruction in method of searching and formulation of clear request is necessary.

Rathore (2010) observed that user education means educating the patrons, whether students, staff, or member of the public, in how to use the library and its services. It is generally agreed that there are three (3) levels of user education which have been summarized by Rathore (2010).

1.      The library orientation is to be given at beginning of every academic year or semester. It should be applicable to all those who are using the library for the first time.

2.      The second stage, i.e. subject oriented instruction for undergraduates at a stage when they are admitted to a special branch or subject of their choices or at the time of      project work.

3.      Literature search training should be provided at the beginning of their research work.

The literature search is specified as being part for post-graduate students but with students developing as self-guided independent learners there is no reason why this should be the case. Depending on the students, the course, and the assignment there may be some overlap between three stages. Knowing which level of user education is required by particular group of students enable the librarian to determine the aims and objectives of the session. The three main aims of user education regardless of level are:

        i.            To train the user to exploit the library resource effectively

      ii.            To provide the user with the skills for independent information seeking.

    iii.            To encourage the user to seek the assistance of library professionals.

Carson and Miller (2005) give a working definition of what constitute integrated user education. It has three essential elements. First, the user education should take place as part of subject specific classes. This would include an assignment involving use of information sources in the library. Secondly, because it is part of subject classes, librarian and teaching staff must work every closely together to ensure quality and focus of the class. Full co-operation by teaching staff is essential. Thirdly, the main dose of instruction should be given in lecture although this does not preclude the student from seeking further help in the library.

By making user education part of existing courses it could be assessed by including one element in a standard piece of coursework which meant that evidence of their research gained them marks, e.g. producing a full bibliography of course searched during the assignment, whether they provide useful or not, as separate from bibliography for the assignment itself. This would be marked by librarians and would lead to piece of work that the student could see in the context of a real assignment rather than as an abstract piece of work. This would lead to deeper learning of the research skills, Morris in Sirajo (2008).

Culkin and Peter (2005) said the aim of user education programme are:

·         To advertise the existence of basic library resources and services.

·         To offer systematic instruction in the use of resources/facilities available in the library.

The main aim of these programmes is to equip a user with enough knowledge on the use of library. These programmes will enable the user to use library resources effectively and efficiently.

Foss (2006) corroborates this by arguing that user education should be organized at different information levels to ensure that need of all users are met. Foss outlines these different levels within the Fourah Bay College (Sierra-Leone) user education programmes. The first stages provide a general introduction to the library. The next stage is concern with more subject and bibliographical material. The third stage of instruction would cater for the needs of advanced and research student. His further basis his level of user education on information levels, the China Ministry of Education on (2008) recommended three levels of user education based on the users educational background. The first level is library orientation for freshmen; the second course of bibliographic instruction for juniors and seniors; and the third is more sophisticated user education involving the sorting and summarizing of document and the studying and analyzing of information for all graduate students

Ford (2006) stated that in South Africa, Australia, Netherlands, issues related to information access and use have become increasing concern and, therefore concepts of user education and information literacy are being incorporated in their school and higher education curriculum. She further point out that the International Federation of Library Association and Institution (IFLA) recognizes the importance of the development of information seeking skills to all members of society.

User education in libraries evolved at the end of the nineteenth century. It appeared that library users were failing to make best use of library and other information resources because of a number of factors (Salony, 2005). Firstly, users did not possess the practical skills needed to exploit libraries. But beyond this, an intelligent information user needed more complex set of intellectual skills, habits, and attitudes.

Vasanthi (2010) observed that user education is essential. It helps publicize library services. It improves the image of the library. Above all, user education and training are the best ways to implement Ranganathan's five laws of library science. User education and training often fee-based, because developing the infrastructure for the network environment are very costly.According to Fjallbraut and Malloy (2010) stated that user education consists of two elements, namely: orientation and instruction. These two elements are not mutually exclusive and can be combined.Orientation is "primarily concerned with ways of introducing the user to the general techniques of library usage and services available, and the organization, layout and facilities of a particular library".Instruction is "concerned with learning to make use of the information resources within specific subject disciplines".

Aina (2014) affirm that through user education the user is able to get any information he/she desires as well as developing the skills to use the resources of the library independently. According to him, there are various methods of impacting the skill on the use of a library. It could be one-to-one session, library orientation/tours, or classroom instruction. It also include information literacy programmes.

Other programmes that have been identified by scholars include: general guides, newsletters, and sign postings, ALA Glossary of Library and Information Science define user education as the term, which encompasses all types of activities design to teach user about library services, facilities and organization, library resources and search strategy. It include instruction in the use of one or more reference sources as a part of reference transaction, library use presentation and bibliographic instruction.

The above views indicate that user education is a continuous process which has to be performed for all user groups. To ensure that users are equipped with efficient method of accessing, evaluating information from variety of sources and synthesizing the information into a coherent whole, training can be organized around level of difficulty of information and or users educational background. The goal of user education should be improved the quality of users research output and ensure learning.

 

 

 

 

2.3       User Orientation in Libraries

Emdad and Rogers as cited in Sirajo (2007) stated that the library needed to develop on orientation programmes to introduce the library to students. They further observed that the librarians needed to do so with the aid of faculty. Emdad and Rogers also called establishment of a library skills course taught by librarians.

Various terminologies have been used to discuss ways of teaching library patrons how to use the library resources. Some of this term are user education, bibliographic instruction, user instruction, information literacy, library orientation etc. These terms are used interchangeably to describe formal and informal library programme on how to maximally utilize library resources (Akalum, 2006). This is useful to make library users acquire necessary skills required to make them competent library users. Several literatures abound by different scholars and writers on the concept of user education in librarianship.

Maduako (2013) defines user education as a planned process and techniques that is armed at equipping library users with the basic skills to help them make optimal use of the resources available in their library. Iheaturu in Edom (2007) corroborating this defines user education as a process whereby potential users of information are made to learn how to make effective and efficient use of the library and its resources through acquisition, location, retrieval and exploitation of information. It is any effort or programme which will guide and instruct existing and potential users individually or collectively with the objective of facilitating the recognition of their information need, effective and efficient use of information services and the assessment of these services. User education consists of all types of activities designed to teach users about library facilities, services, organization, resources and search strategies in order to equip them with basic skills to enable them make optimal, effective, efficient and independent use of information resources and services available in the library (Akimbola, Ogunmede & Emahara: 2010).

The indispensability of user education as instrument for effective utilization of library resources is not in question. This is because the extents to which the library resources are used depend largely on users’ skill and knowledge of information search and retrieval. Esse and Ugwumba (2014) are of the opinion that there cannot be a connection between user and materials or tools without proper education given to users who may not have prior knowledge or idea on the use of such materials or tools. Onyesikuru in Sirajo (2008) notes that effective use of library is expected to be one of the principal objectives of establishing libraries. He insists that for this to be achieved, librarians must instruct the students on how to use the library; they have to familiarize them with the technique of library use and information retrieval.

Esse quoting Ishola (2005) avers that the need for user education has become more urgent as most students come into the university without background. He noted that even where students are probably exposed to the use of the library, the size of the library resources and the organization are complex so they must be introduced to it. Jain (2006) opines that increase in data base in various disciplines has made the need for user education imperative. Moreover, the use of ICT in library operations and services has also expanded the demand to train the users on how to access needed information. Aligu (2011) states that changes brought about by the use of ICT facilities in storing, retrieving and dissemination of information poses challenges on the library users hence the need to instruct them on how well to use them to retrieve information. He insists that the application of ICT into library system demand from an exposure to ICT facilities and be taught on how to use them.

User education is not taught in a vacuum. There are goals and objectives guiding the programme which must be pursued and realized. Iheaturu in Edom (2007) outline the following as the objective of user education. Teach the children how to make efficient use of the library, Make the students aware of the resources of the library in the widest sense, contribute to the personal and intellectual development of the student and to develop his ability to continue with independent learning after his formal education, provide him with capacity to conduct research, obtain and access relevant information and present his findings in a manner acceptable to his peers. Dillroric (2004) insists that the objective of user education is to make the student have Knowledge of the basic kinds of print and non-print materials, knowledge of basic bibliographic tool and how to use them, knowledge of the subject areas related to the primary areas of interest and how to find reference to them. Maduako (2013) quoting NCCE guidelines (1994) summaries the objective of user education and opines that it is aimed at making library user aware of the available and scope of library resources and services.

Edom (2007) contributing on the objective of user education programme avers that it involves all the planned instrument given to library users to enable them make use of the library, explain the information resources and return the piece of information needed with minimal assistance by the library staff. Edoka in Sirajo (2008) asserts that the objective of user education is to help the user make best use of overall library resources. He outlines the following as the objective of user education over information resources available to them as: to develop skill necessary to retrieve required materials; to develop knowledge of materials in readers subject area; to develop skill in presenting bibliographic references; to develop skill required in making advanced studies; and to create a positive attitude to information searching which will stimulate the user to make use of the resources available in different libraries.

There are various methods of impacting the skill on the use of library. Uhegbu in Sirajo (2008) asserts that the success or failure of any user education programme depends to a large extent upon methods adopted to teach it. Ania (2004) states that it could be one-on-one session, library orientation formal or classroom instruction. M. Ramshirish in Sirajo (2008) observed that orientation means familiarization of adjustment to with particular situation. User orientation is concerned with enabling the user to become aware of the existence of the library and the services available there, aiding the user to learn about the general use of library.

According to the Collins Concise "Dictionary" (2005) stated that, the term "orient" means to adjust or align (one self or something else) according to surroundings or circumstance". The term "orientation" means the adjustment or alignment of oneself or one's ideas to surroundings or circumstances. Also called; orientation course: a course, lecture, etc., introducing a new situation or environment.It further observed that orientation is "primarily concerned with ways of introducing the user to the general techniques of library usage and services available, and the organization, lay-out and facilities of a particular library".

Rangathan as cited in Sirajo (2008) preferred the use of term initiation of a freshman instead of orientation. He further observed that the success of an orientation programme in any library would depend upon the proper planning knowledge of the psychology of the users and investment of reference librarian.Suchitra Kar (2006) observed that orientation programme can include imparting education or instruction to the users in:

 

 

 

Introduction to library

1.      About the library: A brief introduction about the library.

2.      Library timings: Opening and closing hours on week days and holidays, closed days, timing for issue and return of books.

3.      Layout of library buildings: Floors, areas, collection, etc, location of various sections, services.

4.      Library rules: Number of books to be issued according to category of borrowers; types of books, loan period for reference books, periodicals, general books and other categories of books, overdue charges; reservation of books.

5.      Staff: Introduction to the in-charge of each section.

6.      Procedures: Membership and registration, borrowing procedures.

7.      Others: Some special features related to the library can be included.

Introduction to library technique

1.      Scheme of classification:Its features, class numbers representing broad subject, arrangement of subject.

2.      Catalogue: Inner form, author title, subject, etc. catalogue, how to catalogue, how to find book with the use of catalogue.

3.      Facilities: Security, etc.

Introduction to information sources and services

1.      Types of reference books and information contained in these, e.g. directories, encyclopedias, bibliographical directories, gazetteers, subject encyclopedia, subject bibliographies, abstract, indexes, serial publication, demographic sources, yearbooks, patents, standards, primary and secondary information sources, use of non-traditional sources.

2.      Types of services provided by the- library to its users like reference services, circulation services, CAS etc. should be mentioned.

Literature search techniques

Use of indexing and abstracting periodicals, thesaurus, Citation, indexes, style manuals, how to use citation, prepare bibliographies etc.Suchitra Kar (2006) further stated that the emergence of information society has put forth the new challenges and responsibilities before the library. Since the libraries are the first place to welcome the forth-corning applications of information technology, as an intermediary of information communication, library professional should know the latest development and let to the users of library know also, user orientation programmes play a vital role in communication between the library and its users.He further stated multi-media based library user orientation program will educate or instruct the user about the library, library techniques, sources and services provided by the library in more efficient and attractive way.He further observed that the general objective of user orientation can be considered as:

a.       The user recognizes the as a primary source of recorded information.

b.      The user recognizes the library staff, particularly the reference staff, as a source of information and is comfortable in seeking assistance from staff members.

c.       Given a map of the library, the user is able to locate key services point (e.g. circulation, reservation, periodicals). The user can identify the location of information and/or reference area(s) of the library.

d.      The user can identify the members of the reference staff by sight and locate their offices.

e.       The user will be familiar with (or has knowledge of) the library resources that are available to him.

f.       The user will know what library units exist on his campus and where they are located. The student know what major information resources and collections will be available in these units.

g.      The user will understand the procedures established for using all or available library facilities.

h.      The user will make effective use of the library resources available to him e.g.

i.        Use of institutional holdings record (such as the card catalogue and serial holdings lists).to locate material in the library system.

j.        Use of reference tools basic to all subject areas, and know how information is organized in their own field of interest, and its basic reference tools.

User orientation takes effort, but is worth in the long run, benefiting both library personnel and library users. The main beneficiaries are the latter of course. Their new knowledge and search-and-find skills would stand them (and their users) in good stead in future. User orientation is important in overcoming threshold fear and establishing and promoting a culture that values books and libraries. (Benjamin Pule Leinancy Public Library, 2007: 1, p3).

2.4       Effect of User Education Programmes on Users of the Library

The effect of userorientation programmes on students cannot be overemphasized. Mohammadi,Moghaddam and Yeganeh (2008) found out that 76.9 percent of the students indicated thatuserorientation was very much important and aided them in their chosen career. It is evident in that study that majority of the students who received training through userorientationprogram were familiar with reference department, the non-circulatory feature of reference books, bibliographies, indexes in reference works among others. Similarly, Fidzani in Omeluzor et at., (2017) affirmed that userorientation helps to improve user's skills in exploiting library resources and services which can lead to greater use of the library. Esse (2014) studied the effect of userorientation on satisfaction with the use of the library and its services by undergraduate students. The finding revealed that use of library course has a significant effect on students' understanding of the library. It also showed thatmajority or 70.3 percent of the respondents indicated that they do not have any difficulty accessing information at the library. User education enhances library use, while inappropriate provision for user education course on the timetable has a negative influence on users' quality of library use (Maduako, 2013).

Atarodi, Alami, and Saeed (2015) assessed user education impact on medical students and found out that 87 percent of the students in their study mentioned that training in the use of library had a positive effect on their knowledge in using databases and existing resources in their resource centers. Also, 74 percent of the students indicated that userorientationinfluenced them to visit the library and medical information databases.

A study by Madukoma, et al. (2013) on userorientationand academic performanceof undergraduates at Babcock University, Nigeria revealed that library instruction helps theundergraduates to know where to search for information in the library (X = 3.30, SD = 0.82). To identify the extent with which library instruction assisted the respondents in locating and retrieving information in the library, the study showed that library instruction helped the respondents to acquire the necessary skill needed for locating/retrieving information (X = 3.46, SD = 0.76). The respondents in that study claimed that through library instruction, access to information was easier because they were exposed to various information materials and services. The study also reveal that userorientation helped users to be familiar with various information retrieval tools and be able to retrieve information materials in the library without much assistance from the librarians and library staff.

An assessment of userorientation program in relation to academic success byBowles-Terry (2012) reveal that students in the focus group were able to show skills or toolslearned in library instruction sessions and were able to use them in research projects assignedfor various classes. The study showed a significant relationship between information literacy instruction and GPA at graduation. Similarly, Shen (2014) studied the effect of online and in personuserorientations on graduate students' information literacy skills. The study shows a significant relationship between user orientation and information literacy skills of the students. It shows that majority of the respondents choose the library or librarian as their starting point for research and had the ability to identify book or chapter title in a citation, while most of them improved in their academic works after the library sessions. Maduako (2013), studied user education and library use in colleges of education inAbia and Imo States and found out that a mean of 3.59 and 3.23 of the respondents stronglyagreed that userorientationprogram turned them into a regular library user. It also revealsthat userorientation made them to be aware of available library resources and services.

Furthermore, Ogunmodede and Emeahara (2010) found out that due to adequate userorientationthat was given to the library users at the Ladoke Akintola University ofTechnology (LAUTECH) library, 76.5 percent of the respondents indicated that there was noneed to rely on the librarians and library staff to access information in the library.Miller in Sirajo (2008), in this study of programme of thirteen libraries, observed that alternatives to formal library instruction programs were point of use devices, expanded references service, and written guides which in his opinions were the best alternatives if they were used. Another issues is where does responsibilities lie for developing and maintaining the user education programmes? Breivik in Sirajo (2008) believe that agrowing needs a single person with a defined role to provide leadership and handle the day-to-day issues. Carlson and Miller as cited in Sirajo (2008) noted such problems as cost, faculty dependency, and the challenges of teaching and the difficulty of evaluation. Other complications they identified were difficulty of achieving a balanced programme and the inability of users to transfer library knowledge from one course to another. Kumar and Kumar as cited in Sirajo (2008) stress the need to supplement practice and techniques of user education with the category and methodology. The application of general principles was considered important, so that the skills acquired could retain usefulness well beyond the immediate learning requirement. In a study done in the late 1960s, Kramaer and Kramer as cited in Sirajo (2008) found a significant correlation between student use of the library and grade point average. They also found a correlation between length of time in school and library instruction.

Nearly fifty years ago, Palmer in Sirajo (2008) criticized librarians for instructing in a vacuum, over-emphasizing the card catalogue, and relying too much on the one short lecture. Palmer also said that librarians must look at the resources that go into instruction, equate that with small number of students reached, and decide if that form of instruction is justified. Her advice was to teach students to find their way from where they are to where they want to go, using whatever method is suitable, and to teach for lifetime learning.

Course-related instruction has long been viewed as one of the most effective user education method. A complication of course-related instruction, however, is the, requirement for facility coop oration and the faculty member's authority to decide when instruction is given and who receives it. In short, librarians have limited control over course-related instruction. These forms of instruction are also-very staff-intensive and this is exacerbated by the high ration of student to librarians that exist in most institution. Those criticisms do not mean an abandonment of the teaching activities of the post, such as course-related instructions, but the librarians need to continue to look for additional ways of reaching students. Course-related instruction, workshops, and land outs are still viable means of teaching information seeking skills

Kumar and Kumar in Sirajo (2008) stress the need to supplement practice and techniques of user education with the category and methodology. The application of general, principles was considered important so that the skills acquired could retain their usefulness well beyond the immediate learning requirement.Irving in Sirajo (2008) suggests the following range of skills: "those associated with reading, writing, searching, retrieving, processing, thinking, analysis, and preventing. Above all its includes the skill of formulation questions and hypotheses knowing what there is to know about and what question to ask in order to find out". Irving hits the button when he emphasizes " Knowing what there is to know about, and what questions to find out". We might all know this to be true and many people encounter feelings of inadequacy when visiting doctors for many doctors are not good at communicating what their patients need to know. And because the field of medicine is fairly esoteric to most of us we are unaware not only of what we have a right to know but also of what question to ask so that the relevant information can be communicated to us.

Basslor in Sirajo (2008) postulated that perhaps user do know what is good for them and that service, not instruction, should be the goal. She believes that libraries that concentrate their resources on collections and services that patrons want will be more successful than those that focus their energy on instructing the patrons. Eadia in Sirajo (2008) goes even further in stating that reserve reading can be adequate for the information needs of most students and describes a library with minimal reference service as working well. Eadia believes that user education came into being not because users asked for it but because librarians thought it would be good for them.Eadia points out that one reason for ineffective library instruction is lack of student motivation. He argues that the generic instruction session trivializes information gathering, that course-related instruction is simply oral bibliography; that audio visual does not hold student interest; and finally, that computer-assisted instruction is very time intensive to produce. He furthered believes handouts are all right if kept short and informal. He advocates a return to the 1960s where things are kept as simple as possible for most students and personal service was provided for those who needed it.

Drucker in Sirajo (2008) has defined an educated person as someone" who has learned how learn and who continues learning especially by formal education throughout his or her life time" (PP66-67) Library user education programs need to support the concept of educating for a lifetime. In examining the future, what factors will affect change? What will be the impact on libraries and librarians? Finally, after looking at the future, a description of the gateway to information will show how and why it may be response to the demand of future education programs.

Green and Gilbort in Sirajo (2008), stated that an information literacy is vowed objective of most library user education on programs, is an expansion of instruction as to objectives materials and methods. I evolved in the way that instruction evolved from library orientation into bibliographic instruction. The Think Tank II report on bibliographic instruction defined "information literacy" as encompassing the entire world of information and seeking to prepare people to pursue the concept of life long learning.

In summary, library user education can encompass a broad range of activities. Its need and importance have received increasing recognition to which librarians have responded with considerable success. There is some concern whether this success can be continued to encompass the broader concept of information literacy.

2.5       Challenges Facing UserOrientation in Academic Institutions

Despite the importance of userorientation on library users, several challenges havebeing identified in research as factors militating against it in academic libraries. Esse (2014)observed that library users all over the world faces various challenges which to an extent affected the way library resources are put to maximum and effective use. Agyen-Gyasi (2008) in his assessment of user education at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology found out that students' low turnout in user education programme was a challenge. Finding in Agyen-Gyasi's study shows that out of 1000 students from the Facultyof Social Sciences, only 250 students attended the user education programme in 2004/2005 session.

Similarly, Anyaoku, Ezeani and Osuigwe (2015) identified students' apathy to information literacy skill programme as a problem in academic libraries. Suleiman (2012) explored user education program in academic libraries in International Islamic University, Malaysia. He stated that majority of the new students entering universities are seriously facing problems of understanding new environment and therefore need special guidance to help them to deal with various sources of information independently. In line with that, Fleming (2006) identifying the greatest problem that library user education programme in the South-East Nigeria and perhaps other areas of the world is facing suggested that libraries should acquire, process and disseminate information resources in a manner that is accessible to library users.

A study conducted by Idoko, Asogwa and Ugwuanyi (2015) on the problems of libraryUser education in Nigerian Unity Schools showed several challenges as noted by staff andstudents including lack of confidence in the use of library, librarian’s mode of instruction not adequate to help students, school libraries not adequately equipped with current text books, lack of adequately equipped school library, and inadequate information resources for learning e.g. computers, among others. On staff strength to handle library instruction in academic institutions, Agyen-Gyasi (2008) in his study found out that shortage of staff to handle user education programme is a problem as the number of registered students outweighed the number of academic librarians to take the library instruction classes. Similarly, Maduako (2013) study showed that an average mean of 2.99 and 3.51 strongly agreed that inadequate library staff to handle library instruction was an impediment. Findings in her study also revealed that short time span, inappropriate provision for user education, lack of interest by students and resource constraintwere among the challenges facing library instruction.

Furthermore, Busawayo in Omeluzor et al. (2017) survey on the perception of students on use of library as a prerequisite course revealed that lack of personnel and professional time for teaching are two major problems facing library user education. However, Case (2007) is of the view that library instruction program would increase the need for space, materials and public services personnel, which according to him will drain funds for other pressing needs of the library and services such as reference and will also create personnel problems relating to scheduling, competence and assessment of teaching. According to Eze in Omeluzor et al. (2017) factors militating against user education are not far-fetched, including insufficient funds, insufficient number of computers, lack of computer appreciation among librarians, teachers and students, absence of properly developed curricula, lack of infrastructure generally and lack of enabling policy environment.

Unarguably, the problem of inadequate or failure to instruct students and new library patrons in using the library may lead to patronage to unauthorized sources and sites. Head (2013) study on how freshmen conduct course research once they enter college revealed that 70 percent of university students frequently turned to social networks, such as Facebook on information-seeking for personal needs. Search engines such as Google received the highest patronage with 95 percent while friends had 87 percent as sources consulted by students for information.

Dike and Amucheazi in Omeluzor et al. (2017) assessed the barriers of information literacy education in Nigeria. They confirmed that learning environment, lack of resources, language barrier, illiteracy, teaching orientation and practice were the factors. The study by Okoye (2013) on user education in federal university libraries across Nigeria revealed that the major challenges facing the program include lack of practical and demonstration on the use of the Internet to conduct researches, inadequate ICT facilities in teaching, and inadequate number of professional staff to conduct user education.

Joseph in Sirajo (2008) identifies the following as problems of user education; Over-dependence on one day orientation progarmme; Lack of collective curriculum for user education programme in Nigerian universities; Use of unqualified personnel to teach the course. Edom (2007) itemizes the problems as follows: Inadequate time, large number of students, inadequate number of instructors/lecturers, inadequate facilities/equipment, high cost of A.V materials, the attitude of lecturers, the attitudes of students and use of library combined with use of English.

 

2.6       The Ways to Improve on the User Orientation Programme.

Adequate and qualified librarians should be employed to teach user education programme. This will help to solve the problem of over population. When there is enough and qualified instructors to handle the course, the number of students assigned to a particular teacher will reduce. This will create room for adequate monitor of the students as well as guarantee quality teaching and learning of the course. The course should be made compulsory and more credit load assigned to it. Again attendance to lectures should be made condition for examination. Students who abscond from class for certain number of times should not be allowed to write examination. This measure will help to check the student’s negative attitude towards the programme.

The time allocated to the teaching of the course should be relevant. More time should be allocated to the course and the scheduling should be made to connect to students. Conducive and enabling environment should be made available for the teaching of the programme. This calls for provision of more and larger spaces to accommodate the students. The facilities and the environment of the classroom should be made conducive for learning.

Instructional materials such as audiovisual materials, public address system and projectors should be made available. This will help to make the course interesting and stimulate student’s interest towards the course. The course should be designed to be more practical oriented to complement the theoretical aspect of it.

 

 

 

 

2.7       Summary of the Review

The review examined some literature that is related to user orientation programme in university libraries and importance of these programmes to library users on use of library resources. The terms, User Education, User Orientation and Library Orientation are deemed synonymous. But in recent years differences are attributed to them, particularly User Education and other concept.

The User Education Programmes especially in this category/ are considered as higher level of orientation programmes. Whereas orientation and other instructional training courses are rather initiation types freshman guidance technique. User orientation programmes should aim to make all users aware of information resources available, both directly in the library and form external sources and enable the users to enjoy the search of information.It is interesting to note that most of literature review cited in this chapter emphasize and stress the self-sufficiency users of through a successful user orientation programmes.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES

Agyen-Gyasi, K. (2008). User education at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) Library: Prospects and challenges. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/agyen-gyasi.htm

Aina, L.0.(2014). Library and information science text for Africa. Ibadan: third world information publishing limited.

Akimbola, O., Ogunmede, A. & Emahara, D. (2010). Significance of user education programme on the use library. International Journal of Research in Education. 4(1&2): 188-192

Atarodi, A., Alami, A. & Saeed, S.J.G.M. (2015). User education impact on Medical students. Scholar Journal of Applied Medical Sciences (SJAMS). 3(3C), 1252-1258.

Bowles-Terry, M. (2012). Library Instruction and Academic Success: A mixed - methods assessment of a library instruction program. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 7 (1), 82-95.

Bruner, P. (2006). Evaluating library instruction in academic libraries: A critical review of literature, 1980-1993. The Reference Librarian, 24 (51-52), 53-71

Carson I. and Miller G. (2005). Orientation session in Israel Academic libraries. Research strategies, 13 (summer), and pp. 165 - 75

Edom, B.O. (2007). The Impact of user education on the University Libraries in Nigeria. Heartland Journal of Library and Information Science. 1(1) 43-48. 

Esse, O & Ugwumba, C (2014). Effect of library instruction on the satisfaction with the use of library and its services: A case study of undergraduates in five universities in Southern part of Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 10(13).

Esse, U. C. (2014). Effects of library instruction on satisfaction with the use of library and its services: A study of undergraduate students in five universities in the Southern part of Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 10(13), 441-450.

Fjallbraut N. and Malloy M. (2010). User education in libraries. London: Clive Bingley

Fleming, H. (2006). User education in academic libraries in the U.K. British Journal of Academic Librarianship. 1(1):18-35.

Fleming, H. (2010). User education in academic learing in Nigeria libraries 16 (13). Pg 102

Ford, B.T. (2006). User education in academic libraries: A study of trends and developments in Southern Africa.

Foss, V. M. (2006). “Reader instruction at Fonirah Bay College Library”.University of Sierra Leone Journal. 1 (1): 36 - 39

Head, A. J. (2013). How freshmen conduct course research once they enter college. Retrieved June 2016 http://projectinfolit.org/images/pdfs/pil_2013_freshmenstudy_fullreport.pdf

Idoko, N. A., Asogwa, B. E. & Ugwuanyi, R. N. C. (2015). Problems of library user education in Nigerian Unity Schools. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1216

Ishola, S. O (2005). User education in the institutions of higher learning in Nigeria. Nigerian Libraries 16(3):102.

Maduako, W. (2013). Serial publication in large libraries 16 Allerton Park Institute.

Mahdi Mohammadi, M., Moghaddam, A. I. & Yeganeh, M. E. (2008). Students’ perception of the impact of user education on the use of reference resources: An Iranian experience. Retrieved from  http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/mohammadimoghaddam-yeganeh.htm

Mews, K (2010). Training on user education programme in Nigeria. Lagos Journal of Library and Information Science 3(5) 20-24

Mohammadi, M., Moghaddam, A.I. & Yeganeh, (2008). Student’s perception of the impact of user education on the use of reference resources: An Iranian experience. Retrieved June 30, 2016 from http://unilib.unl.ed/LPP//PP2010.htm

Ogunmodede, T. A. & Emeahara, E. N. (2010). The effect of library use education as a course on library patronage: A case study of LAUTECH Library, Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Retrieved from  http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/426/

Ogunmodede, T. A. & Emeahara, E. N. (2010). The effect of library use education as a course on library patronage: A case study of LAUTECH Library, Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Retrieved from  http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/426/

Omeluzor, S., Akibu, A. A. & Dika, S. I. (2017). Methods, Effect and Challenges of Library Instruction in Academic Libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1465. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1465

Rathore J. (2010). User education programme in Academic Libraries. Lucknow librarian, 24 (3) 2010, 104 - 107

Salony, M (2005). The history of bibliographic instruction: changing trends from books to the electronic world. The reference librarian.

Shen, L. (2016).  Both online and in-person library orientations have positive effects on graduate students’ information literacy skills. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(2), 189-191.

Sirajo, H. (2008). User orientation and its effect on use of serial publication. A case study of Kashim Ibrahim Library, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. An unpublished project submitted to department of library and information science, Ahamdu Bello University, Zaria.

Suchitra, K (2006). Library organization, New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House Ltd.

Suleiman, S. A. (2012). User education programs in academic libraries: The experience of the International Islamic University Malaysia students. Library Philosophy and Practice.Retrieved from: digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1851&context=libphilprac

The ministry of education china (2008): A few view – points on improvement for course of bibliographic instruction. Quoted by Fang P. and Daniel Callision (2008) “user education in Academic libraries of China”. International Library review, 22, 95 - 103

Tiefel, V.M. (1995). Library user education examining its past, projecting its future. Library Trend; 4 (2) 318-338.

Vasanthi, M.C. (2010). Transforming administration in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 23 (3): 183 - 189

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.1       Introduction

This chapter focuses on the method of research adopted for this study. It is discussed under the following sub heading:

3.2       Research Design

3.3       Area of Study

3.4       Population of the Study

3.5       Sample and Sampling Techniques

3.6       Instrument for Data Collection

3.7       Validity of the Instrument

3.8       Reliability of the Instrument

3.9       Procedures for Data Collection

3.10     Procedures for Data Analysis

3.2       Research Design

The research design adopted for this study is survey research method. This method will deliberately be used because it will help the researcher to gather some factual information which will be used to solve the problems of the study, Osuala (2003).

3.3       Area of the Study

The study was carried out at Kashim Ibrahim Library, Ahmadu Bello University Zaria Kaduna State – Nigeria.

3.4       Population of the Study

The population of the study consists of the entire registered students of the Ahamdu Bello University Library, Zaria which is Fifteen thousand (15000).

3.5       Sample and Sampling Techniques

The researcher is going to make use of two percent (2%) of the total population of fifteen thousand. Therefore, the sample size is 300 students and the researcher is going to make use of random sampling techniques to choose the respondents.A simple random sampling technique will be adopted for the study.This is line with the recommendations of Krejcie and Morgan (1970) table of determining sample size for a very large population.

3.6       Instrument of Data Collection

Questionnaire was the instrument employed to collect data for the study. This choice was motivated by the belief that it allow for the use of large sample. It also allows the respondents privacy and time to preserve it and answer the question objectively.

3.7       Validity of the Instrument

For effective validity of the research instrument, the draft of the questionnaires was given to my supervisor and two other lecturers in the department. The corrected version of the instrument was retyped and there after distributed to the target respondents.

3.8       Reliability of the Instrument

The instruments were also being taken through pilot testing to improve on the efficiency of the research instrument. Reliability dealt with the quality of measurement thus it is the “consistency” or “repeatability” of the research measure. Mugenda (2015) states that reliability measure the degree to which a research instrument would yield the same result or data after repeated trials, is influenced by random errors that may arise from coding, ambiguous instructions and bias among others.

Reliability was done using pilot test. In this study, reliability testing was done by using test-retest method. The questionnaires were administered to some selected students of the college so as to test the reliability of the data is often.

3.9       Procedure for Data Collection

The data collected were analyzed under the framework of description analysis. Simple percentage (%) were used to compute the date of the subject on the basis of the answer provided.

3.10     Procedure for Data Analysis

Questionnaires will be duly analyzed using descriptive statistics which includes simple percentages based on the responses from the respondents.The interview will be interpreted normally.

 

 

 

 

 

REFERENCES

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Table of determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement.

Mugenda, V. A. (2015). Social science research; principles, method and application. Enugu: El “Demark publisher.

Osuola, B. (2003). Introduction to research methodology in social science. Ibadan: University of Ibadan Press.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

4.1       Introduction

This chapter presents data presentation and analysis.

4.2       Response Rate

Three hundred (300) questionnaires were administered to the users of Kashim Ibrahim Library, ABU Zaria. Only 145 response rate was achieved which indicate a percentage of 48.3%. This is because short time was given for the respondents to respond to the questionnaires and subsequent follow up for completion and returned of the questionnaires.

4.3       Data Presentation and Analysis

The returned questionnaires were thoroughly examined and analyzed as shown in the following tables:

Table 4.3.1: Level

Variable

Frequency

Percentage (%)

100 Level 

40

27.6

200 level

35

24.1

300 level

28

19.3

400 level

22

15.2

Others

20

13.8

Total

145

100%

Source: field survey, 2019

Table 4.3.1 shows the level distribution of the respondent. It response representing 27.6% were 100 level, 24.1% of the respondent were 200 level, 19.3% of the response represent 300 level, 15.2% of the response rate represent 400 level while 13.8% of the response represent others. This shows that majority of the respondent are from 100 level.

Table 4.3.2: Faculty

Variable

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Agriculture

5

3.4

Art

25

17.2

Education

20

13.8

Engineering

13

8.9

Environment design

17

11.7

Medicine

10

6.9

Pharmaceutical science

8

5.5

Science

25

17.2

Social science

15

10.3

Veterinary  medicine

7

4.8

Total

145

100%

Source: field survey, 2019

Table 4.3.2 shows the faculty of the respondents. 3.4% of the response represent agriculture, 17.2% represent Art, 13.8% represent Education, 8.9% represent Engineering, 11.7% represent Environment design, 6.9% represent Medicine, 5.5% represent Pharmaceutical science, 17.2% represent Science, 10.3% represent Social science, while 4.8% represent Veterinary  medicine. However, this shows that the respondents from faculty of Art and Science are more than other faculties.

 

 

 

Table 4.3.3: Gender   

Variable

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Male

69

47.6

Female

76

52.4

Total

145

100%

Source: field survey, 2019

Table 4.3.3 shows the gender of the respondents. 52.4% of the response were female while 47.6% of the response rate were male. However, this shows that the population of females are more than the males.

Table 4.3.4: Age distribution

Variable

Frequency

Percentage (%)

15-20years

17

11.7

21 – 25years

50

34.4

26 – 30 years

40

27.6

31 – 35 years

20

13.8

36 and above years

18

12.4

Total

145

100%

Source: field survey, 2019

Table 4.3.4 shows the age distribution of the respondents. 34.4% of the response were within age (21-25yrs), 27.6% response were within age (26-30yrs), 13.8% of the response were within age (31-35yrs), 11.7% response were within age (15-20yrs) while 12.4% of the response were within the age of 36 and above years. This shows that the majority of the respondents were within the age bracket (21-25yrs).

 

 

Table 4.3.5: Did you attend any orientation programme at the start of this semester?

Variable

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Yes

89

61.4

No

56

38.6

Total

145

100%

Source: field survey, 2019

Table 4.3.5 shows if the respondents attend any orientation programme at the start of the semester. 61.4% of the respondents said yes while 38.6% of the respondents said No. This shows that majority of the respondent attended orientation programme at the start of semester.

 Table 4.3.6: Library services in which the orientation centers on users

Variable

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Circulation services

33

22.7

Reference services

22

15.2

Technical services

14

9.6

Serial services

21

14.5

Media services

25

17.2

All of the above

30

20.7

Total

145

100%

Source: field survey, 2019

Table 4.3.6 show the library services the orientation centers. 22.7% represent circulation services, 17.2% represent media services, 15.2% represent reference services, 14.5% represent serial services, and 20.7% represent all of the above while 9.6% represent technical service. It shows that the orientation centers on users in all of the above services.

 

 

Table 4.3.7: Form the orientation takes         

Variable

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Lectures

80

55.2

Tours

45

31.0

All of the above

20

13.8

Total

145

100

Source: field survey, 2019

Table 4.3.7 shows the form in which the orientation takes. 55.2% response represent lectures, 31.0% represent tours while 13.8% represent all of the above. This means the orientation usually take lectures form.

Table 4.3.8: The effect of orientation programme on users

Variable

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Helps students to get familiar with the library sections

10

6.9

helps to improve user's skills in exploiting library resources and services

9

6.2

Improves students' understanding of the library

18

12.4

Helps students to know where to search for information

16

11.0

Easy access to information resources in the library

10

6.9

All of the above

82

56.6

Total

145

100

Source: field survey, 2019

Table 4.3.8 shows the effect of the orientation programme on users. 6.2% choose helps to improve user's skills in exploiting library resources and services, 6.9% choose Helps students to get familiar with the library sections, easy access to information resources in the library, 11% choose helps students to know where to search for information, 12.4% choose improves students' understanding of the library while 56.6% choose all of the above. This shows that all of the above mentioned are tremendous effects on the users because it improves their consulting skills.

Table 4.3.9: The problems encountered in conducting orientation programme

Variable

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Low turnout during conducting user education programme

35

24.1

Shortage of staff to handle user education programme

12

8.3

Inappropriate provision for user education

17

11.7

Inappropriate provision for user education

20

13.8

Lack of interest by students

45

31.0

Insufficient funds

16

11.0

Total

145

100

Source: field survey, 2019

Table 4.3.9 shows the problems encountered in conducting orientation programme. 24.1% said low turnout during conducting user education programme, 8.3% said shortage of staff to handle user education programme, 11.7% said inappropriate provision for user education, 13.8% said inappropriate provision for user education, 31% said lack of interest by students while 11% choose insufficient funds. This means lack of interest by students is the major problems encountered in conducting orientation programme for users.

Table 4.3.10: The ways to improve the orientation programme

Variable

Frequency

Percentage (%)

Adequate and qualified librarians

10

6.9

Instructional materials such as audiovisual materials should be made available

56

38.6

Adequate fund should be provided

35

24.1

The course should be made compulsory for students

27

18.6

More time should be allocated for the programme

17

11.7

Total

145

100

Source: field survey, 2019

Table 4.3.10 shows the ways to improve the orientation programme. 38.6% said instructional materials such as audiovisual materials should be made available, 24.1% said adequate fund should be provided, 18.6% said the course should be made compulsory for students, 11.7% said more time should be allocated for the programme while 6.9% said adequate and qualified librarians. However, it can be deduce that instructional materials such as audio visual materials is the major way to improve orientation programme in the library.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

5.1       Introduction

This chapter presents the summary of the study and the major findings, conclusion and recommendations.

5.2       Summary of the Study

The purpose of the study was to the investigate user orientation and its effects on use of library materials in Kashim Ibrahim Library, Ahmadu Bello University Library. The researcher therefore, attempted to determine user orientation in libraries, the effect of user education programmes on users of the library, the problems encounter in conducting the orientations programme and the ways to improve on the orientation programme of the library. In order to achieve the objectives of the study, four research questions were raised. The researcher made use of survey research method for the study. The choice of this research method was informed by the nature of the research problem being investigated.

The population of the study consists of the entire registered students of the Ahamdu Bello University Library, Zaria. A simple random sampling technique was adopted to choose the respondents for the study. The research instruments used to collect data for the study were questionnaire. Descriptive analysis using frequency table and simple percentages were used to analyze the data collected. The results of the findings were presented in tables, figures and showing their relative frequencies to their corresponding percentages.

 

 

 

5.3       Summary of the Findings

The summary of the major findings of the study are as follows:

1.      Kashim Ibrahim Library does not usually conduct user – orientation for the users of the library.

2.      The effect of the orientation on the users of the library are; It helps to improve user's skills in exploiting library resources and services, helps students to get familiar with the library sections, easy access to information resources in the library, helps students to know where to search for information and improves students' understanding of the library.

3.      The problems encountered in conducting the orientation are; low turnout during conducting user education programme, inappropriate provision for user education, lack of interest by students and insufficient funds.

4.      The ways to improve on the orientation programmes of the K.I.L ABU Zaria are; instructional materials such as audiovisual materials should be made available, adequate fund should be provided, the course should be made compulsory for students, and more time should be allocated for the programme.

5.4       Suggestions for Further Research

1.         User orientation and its effect on use of reference materials in Ahmadu Bello University Library, Zaria

2.         Effect of user education on students’ use of the library in Ahmadu Bello University Library Zaria, Kaduna – Nigeria

3.         Impact of library instructionprogramme on students of North Federal-University: University of Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria-Kaduna; Nigeria.

 

 

5.5       Conclusion

From the analysis of the findings; it could be concluded that Kashim Ibrahim Library does not usually have an orientation programme and the orientation centers on circulation library services for easy access and retrieval of information resources by users of the library. It is done to educate the users on the use of library. However, users anticipate in all form of the orientation and they visit the sections in the library frequently.

5.6       Recommendations

            In the light of the finding of the study, it is suggested that:

1.      General courses on library education should be created so that users might know about information sources and resources and how to exploit such resources effectively and efficiently by following the rules and regulations of the library.

2.      Establishing exchange programmes which would enable exchange of user education publications used to educate large numbers. This promote sharing of ideas in addressing similar problems.

3.      Problems which hinder the effective and efficient implementation of the programmes such as shortage of professional staff to handle large numbers of users, inadequate time allocated for user orientate and lack of cooperation between the library staff and faculty. Librarians have to ensure effective and efficient user orientation programmes.

 

 

 

 

 

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Agyen-Gyasi, K. (2008). User education at the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) Library: Prospects and challenges. Library Philosophy and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/agyen-gyasi.htm

Aina, L.0.(2014). Library and information science text for Africa. Ibadan: third world information publishing limited.

Akimbola, O., Ogunmede, A. & Emahara, D. (2010). Significance of user education programme on the use library. International Journal of Research in Education. 4(1&2): 188-192

Atarodi, A., Alami, A. & Saeed, S.J.G.M. (2015). User education impact on Medical students. Scholar Journal of Applied Medical Sciences (SJAMS). 3(3C), 1252-1258.

Bowles-Terry, M. (2012). Library Instruction and Academic Success: A mixed - methods assessment of a library instruction program. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 7 (1), 82-95.

Bruner, P. (2006). Evaluating library instruction in academic libraries: A critical review of literature, 1980-1993. The Reference Librarian, 24 (51-52), 53-71

Carson I. and Miller G. (2005). Orientation session in Israel Academic libraries. Research strategies, 13 (summer), and pp. 165 - 75

Edom, B.O. (2007). The Impact of user education on the University Libraries in Nigeria. Heartland Journal of Library and Information Science. 1(1) 43-48. 

Esse, O & Ugwumba, C (2014). Effect of library instruction on the satisfaction with the use of library and its services: A case study of undergraduates in five universities in Southern part of Nigeria. European Scientific Journal, 10(13), 441-450.

Fabunmi, P. M. (2012). User education and library use in college of education in Abia and Imo State Library philosophy and practice

Fjallbraut N. and Malloy M. (2010). User education in libraries. London: Clive Bingley

Fleming, H. (2006). User education in academic libraries in the U.K. British Journal of Academic Librarianship. 1(1):18-35.

Fleming, H. (2010). User education in academic learing in Nigeria libraries 16 (13). Pg 102

Ford, B.T. (2006). User education in academic libraries: A study of trends and developments in Southern Africa.

Foss, V. M. (2006). “Reader instruction at Fonirah Bay College Library”.University of Sierra Leone Journal. 1 (1): 36 - 39

Head, A. J. (2013). How freshmen conduct course research once they enter college. Retrieved June 2016 http://projectinfolit.org/images/pdfs/pil_2013_freshmenstudy_fullreport.pdf

http://library. abu.edu.ng/pages/about/php

Idoko, N. A., Asogwa, B. E. & Ugwuanyi, R. N. C. (2015). Problems of library user education in Nigerian Unity Schools. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal), Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1216

Ishola, S. O (2005). User education in the institutions of higher learning in Nigeria. Nigerian Libraries 16(3):102.

Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Table of determining sample size for research activities. Educational and psychological measurement.

Maduako, W. (2013). Serial publication in large libraries 16 Allerton Park Institute.

Mahdi Mohammadi, M., Moghaddam, A. I. & Yeganeh, M. E. (2008). Students’ perception of the impact of user education on the use of reference resources: An Iranian experience. Retrieved from  http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/mohammadimoghaddam-yeganeh.htm

Mews, K (2010). Training on user education programme in Nigeria. Lagos Journal of Library and Information Science 3(5) 20-24

Mohammadi, M., Moghaddam, A.I. & Yeganeh, (2008). Student’s perception of the impact of user education on the use of reference resources: An Iranian experience. Retrieved June 30, 2016 from http://unilib.unl.ed/LPP//PP2010.htm

Mugenda, V. A. (2015). Social science research; principles, method and application. Enugu: El “Demark publisher.

Ogunmodede, T. A. & Emeahara, E. N. (2010). The effect of library use education as a course on library patronage: A case study of LAUTECH Library, Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Retrieved from  http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/426/

Ogunmodede, T. A. & Emeahara, E. N. (2010). The effect of library use education as a course on library patronage: A case study of LAUTECH Library, Ogbomoso, Nigeria. Retrieved from  http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/426/

Omeluzor, S., Akibu, A. A. & Dika, S. I. (2017). Methods, Effect and Challenges of Library Instruction in Academic Libraries. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). 1465. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1465

Osuola, B. (2003). Introduction to research methodology in social science. Ibadan: University of Ibadan Press.

Rathore J. (2010). User education programme in Academic Libraries. Lucknow librarian, 24 (3) 2010, 104 - 107

Salony, M (2005). The history of bibliographic instruction: changing trends from books to the electronic world. The reference librarian.

Shen, L. (2016).  Both online and in-person library orientations have positive effects on graduate students’ information literacy skills. Evidence Based Library and Information Practice, 11(2), 189-191.

Sirajo, H. (2008). User orientation and its effect on use of serial publication. A case study of Kashim Ibrahim Library, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria. An unpublished project submitted to Department of Library and Information Science, Ahamdu Bello University, Zaria.

Suchitra, K (2006). Library organization, New Delhi, Vikas Publishing House Ltd.

Suleiman, S. A. (2012). User education programs in academic libraries: The experience of the International Islamic University Malaysia students. Library Philosophy and Practice.Retrieved from: digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1851&context=libphilprac

The ministry of education china (2008): A few view – points on improvement for course of bibliographic instruction. Quoted by Fang P. and Daniel Callision (2008) “user education in Academic libraries of China”. International Library review, 22, 95 - 103

Vasanthi, M.C. (2010). Transforming administration in academic libraries. The Journal of Academic Librarianship 23 (3): 183 - 189

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

APPENDIX I

Department of Library and Information Science,

College of Administrative Studies and Social Sciences,

Kaduna Polytechnic,

Kaduna State.

September, 2019.

 

Dear Sir/ma,

This questionnaire has been designed to obtain information for a research on the topic, User Orientation and its effects on use of library resources in Kashim Ibrahim library, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

This is done in partial fulfillment of the requirement for award of Higher National Diploma (HND) of Library and Information Science in Kaduna Polytechnic, Kaduna State. It will be appreciated if your respond to these questions is sincerely and objectively. Be assured that all information given shall be treated with utmost confidentiality and will be used for research purpose only. Your prompt response to this questionnaire will be highly appreciated.

Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.

 

                                                                                                Yours Sincerely,         

                                                           

 

 

 

 

 

APPENDIX II

QUESTIONNAIRE

Instruction: please tick the appropriate box

Section A: Personal Data

1.      Level

a.       100 Level  (           )                      

b.      200 level    (           )

c.       300 level    (           )

d.      400 level    (           )

e.       Others       (           )

2.      Faculty

a.       Agriculture                        (           )

b.      Art                                     (           )

c.       Education                          (           )

d.      Engineering                       (           )

e.       Environment design          (           )

f.       Medicine                           (           )

g.      Pharmaceutical science     (           )

h.      Science                              (           )

i.        Social science                    (           )

j.        Veterinary  medicine         (           )

3.      Gender           

a.       Male          (           )          

b.      female       (           )

 

4.      Age distribution         

a.       15-20years             (           )

b.      21 – 25years          (           )

c.       26 – 30 years         (           )

d.      31 – 35 years         (           )

e.       36 and above years (         )

Section B

5.      Did you attend any orientation programme at the start of this semester       

a.       Yes                        (           )                      

b.      No                                     (           )

6.      On which library routine did the orientation center?

a.       Circulation services                                   (           )

b.      Reference services                                    (           )

c.       Technical services                                     (           )

d.      Serial services                                            (           )

e.       Media services                                          (           )

f.       All of the above                                        (           )

7.      What form did the orientation take?

a.       Lectures                            (           )          

b.      tours                                  (           )          

c.       all of the above                 (           )

8.      What is the effect of orientation programme on user?

a.       Helps students to get familiar with the library sections                            (           )

b.      helps to improve user's skills in exploiting library resourcesand

services                                                                                                    (           )

c.       improves students' understanding of the library                                 (           )

d.      helps students to know where to search for information                          (           )

e.       easy access to information resources in the library                                   (           )

f.       all of the above                                                                                         (           )

9.      What are the problems encountered in conducting orientation programme?

a.       low turnout during conducting user education programme                      (           )

b.      shortage of staff to handle user education programme                            (           )

c.       inappropriate provision for user education                                               (           )

d.      inappropriate provision for user education                                               (           )

e.       lack of interest by students                                                                       (           )

f.       insufficient funds                                                                                      (           )

10.  What are the ways to improve the orientation programme?

a.       Adequate and qualified librarians                                                             (           )

b.      Instructional materials such as audiovisual materialsshouldbe

Made available                                                                                          (           )

c.       Adequate fund should be provided                                                          (           )

d.      The course should be made compulsory for students                               (           )

e.       More time should be allocated for the programme                                   (           )

 

 

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

THE ROLE OF NGO ON CHILDREN WITH DISABILITY

EFFECT OF GINGER AND GARLIC ON THE GROWTH PERFORMANCES OF BROILER CHICKEN

Student Industrial Work Experience Scheme Report sample